My contributions here are that OPTICS are important for our community leaders. When we make decisions, we need to consider their implications from all angles. Intent is one thing, but unintended consequences occur [even accidentally John] when we do not consider all perspectives.
I know for a fact on chat you have been coaching and helping NAS, and I think that is admirable.....I even helped a bit, and you know that....... But let's consider Eddie's perspective as a possible negative perception from an "optics" viewpoint. Dragon has been busting his ass, claiming everything in sight, and this is a situation where "Eddie is right and you are not wrong, but please consider the consequences of even little actions".
What will eventually happen is a limit to the number of TCR's one can create on a monthly basis, and/or a 3-owner minimum for TCR's.
Take away the emotions and look strictly at the results. This is not something we would want a stable making a HUGE run after 15+ seasons to see on the results page. I wouldn't, you wouldn't, nobody would. You are not wrong, in the strictest sense of the rules, but in the "spirit of the game", and in the "optics", please consider potential consequences, particularly from 2-trainer TCR's.
Thanks Greek, and I know you do not take this personally. You are an asset, like Eddie and several others. We need to work together. This is no big deal, but I feel it was very important that Eddie pointed it out, for future reference to the community, all other things aside.
My best John,
Orb
I know for a fact on chat you have been coaching and helping NAS, and I think that is admirable.....I even helped a bit, and you know that....... But let's consider Eddie's perspective as a possible negative perception from an "optics" viewpoint. Dragon has been busting his ass, claiming everything in sight, and this is a situation where "Eddie is right and you are not wrong, but please consider the consequences of even little actions".
What will eventually happen is a limit to the number of TCR's one can create on a monthly basis, and/or a 3-owner minimum for TCR's.
Take away the emotions and look strictly at the results. This is not something we would want a stable making a HUGE run after 15+ seasons to see on the results page. I wouldn't, you wouldn't, nobody would. You are not wrong, in the strictest sense of the rules, but in the "spirit of the game", and in the "optics", please consider potential consequences, particularly from 2-trainer TCR's.
Thanks Greek, and I know you do not take this personally. You are an asset, like Eddie and several others. We need to work together. This is no big deal, but I feel it was very important that Eddie pointed it out, for future reference to the community, all other things aside.
My best John,
Orb
Comment