Categories
Search


Advanced Search
 »  Home  »  Racing News  »  Featured Articles  »  Digitaldowns.us versus Members
Digitaldowns.us versus Members
By TR - Tracksider Reporter | Published  02/22/2007 | Featured Articles | Rating:
TR - Tracksider Reporter

Enjoy Videography & simulated horse racing... at  DigitalDowns.us !!

 

View all articles by TR - Tracksider Reporter
Digitaldowns.us versus Members
Changes made by administration/programmers in the past have been instated due to player requests. It is true, that administration has also instated changes at D/D for player interests & for the perfecting of a simulated horse racing game. All veteran players have witnessed changes along the way in/for each season. Are these changes expectable? I suppose one would say if the change(s) were to constitute excessive wins that would generate an influx of income for a stable member, then the change(s) would be acceptable. But, as we know, changes at D/D are changes that reflect back upon every stable signed up at D/D. Therefore, it is going to always be a win loose situation with changes made at/by D/D. That of seeing each & every member content with a change, or with a number of changes.

 

Do we as players/members approve of the changes? Possibly some of us approve & some of us disapprove. As the saying go’s, to be capable of satisfying every players preference, would be as much chance us being selected as a candidate to go to the moon with a team of astronauts. The impossibility is the ruling factor versus the possibility which would be a non ruling factor. Yet, the possibility of Administration/programmers meeting player requests would be a ruling factor.

 

Therefore, are we as member’s discontent with D/D attempting to perfect a game as near to reality, or, do we, or would we prefer a game of simplicity? There would be many different replies to the question. In honesty, wouldn’t one prefer a game that is as near to reality as possible, considering it is a simulated computer game, even though it still involves our hard earned dollar? Whether, one contemplates the elements instituted by Administration/Programmers into/at D/D, one would still have to give those involved behind the scene, if I/we may, a hand of applause.

 

The work load/requirements to continually have a site as D/D in operation alone leaves a lot to be desired to those involved behind the scene. One can be certain that possibly a day never goes by in which some sort of adjustment is required to keep the operation operating smoothly. One has to be appreciative for Administration/Programmers continued efforts overall.

 

In return, D/D appears to continually provide at its best for the best… its members, therefore, one would have to say, Thank You D/D for your continued efforts. And in return, individuals continue to sign on as members at D/D, members giving their moral/financial support to a simulated horse racing site, that of Digitaldowns.us.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Add comment
Related Articles
Comments


Article Options
Articles to Read
Popular Articles
  1. Racing Forum Offers Wealth of Knowledge
  2. DigitalDowns.us at Saratoga Race Result
  3. DigitalDowns.us at Belmont Race Result
  4. Churchill Downs to go Digital
  5. Mastering The Meters (Part 2) - Gelding
No popular articles found.
Popular Authors
  1. Skip Scoop
  2. Carl Admin
  3. Paddock Scribe
  4. TR - Tracksider Reporter
  5. Rail Bird
  6. Thunder Downunder
  7. Trackside Reporter
  8. Dr. Jay Trotter
  9. Nigel Moody
  10. Jack Wagner
No popular authors found.